README quality issues hinder adoption of Go robotics framework
Problem
Users criticize the README as overly verbose and filled with buzzword phrasing, making it hard to grasp the framework's purpose; they also question its conceptual analogy (e.g., virtual CAN bus), causing uncertainty during adoption.
Pain points
- README is too verbose and uses obscure marketing phrasing
- Documentation contains unnecessary obscure analogies
Questions to verify
- Would you be willing to collaborate on improving the README?
- Do you need clearer explanations of concepts (e.g., virtual CAN bus)?
- Would you prefer a more concise documentation structure?
Evidence
quote
the readme written by Claude is annoying. At least it explains what the project does but imho the writing needs a healthy human pass to remove all the bullshit phrasing "Gorai stops pretending otherwise..." perfect example.
quote
IMHO the Readme is too verbose, it contains a lot of information that should be somewhere else than a landing page.
quote
So it is like a virtual CAN bus?
Disclaimer: this card is distilled by AI from community discussions as “pain point evidence”. It is a starting point for need analysis and validation, not a “validated market need”. AI has analytical limits; please open the original discussion above to manually verify before key decisions.