AI-generated TypeScript needs robust linting rules
Problem
Developers using AI‑assisted code generation need to guard against unsafe types, duplicate code, and low‑value tests, and they seek plugin‑friendly lint rules to improve code quality.
Pain points
- Need for defensive/aggressive lint config to block unsafe Reflect.get usage
- Detection and prevention of low‑value tests
- Lack of plugin support limiting oxlint rule extensibility
- Demand for AST‑based rules comparable to anti‑slop
Questions to verify
- How strict is the current lint configuration in your AI‑generated code workflow?
- What level of test coverage do you require?
- Do you want oxlint to support plugins for extending custom rules?
Evidence
quote · @Anonymous
without a extremely defensive/aggressive lint config and test coverage near ~80% most of these developments would be quiet impossible.`no-reflect-get` is definitely one I'd adopt, claude LOVES `Reflect.get` for some reason
quote · @Anonymous
I agree https://github.com/dmmulroy/anti-slop is very cool (heard about it via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix1qQK1IvmA).But what does this add beyond that?
Disclaimer: this card is distilled by AI from community discussions as “pain point evidence”. It is a starting point for need analysis and validation, not a “validated market need”. AI has analytical limits; please open the original discussion above to manually verify before key decisions.