DSL 让 Agent 流程可复用、可评估
问题概述
开发者希望将可重复的 Agent 工作抽象为可定义的工作流，以避免为每个任务启动完整的 Agent 循环，并能够单独评估证据筛选和步骤。
痛点标签
- 需要一种 DSL 来捕获工作流步骤和工具调用
- 希望能够单独评估证据筛选和步骤
- 对可重用的工作流定义 across projects 感兴趣
待验证问题
- Would you use a DSL to define agent workflows instead of building full agent loops?
- Do you need the ability to evaluate evidence screening independently?
- Are you interested in reusable workflow definitions across different projects?
证据
事实
You can combine tool calls, code, Jev-powered system one decisions for things like routing and screening evidence, and agents when a step needs more investigation.
事实
The idea is to make the work easier to understand and avoid paying for a full agent loop where one isn’t needed.
原话
I'll study it as I am toying with "what should a workflow definition language look like".
原话
Graph workflows are useless if there are edges without cost or effort attributes and termination states without reward.
原话
Interesting use of Jev-as-a-judge. How do you deal with having to reason before judging a step?
免责声明：本卡片由 AI 从社区讨论中提炼，属于「痛点证据」，是需求分析与验证的起点，不等同于「已验证的市场需求」。AI 存在分析局限，关键决策前请打开上方原始讨论人工复核。