SF自行车路由工具的准确性与体验优化需求
问题概述
现有的SF扁平路由工具在路径规划准确性、界面交互体验以及对非坡度因素（如路面质量、不连续段、区域舒适度）的考虑上存在明显不足。用户反映路径建议可能错误、界面交互困惑，且缺乏对自行车道连通性和避开拥挤区域的优化。此外，用户希望能在‘最平’与‘距离/海拔增益’之间进行自定义权衡。
痛点标签
- 路径规划建议错误，优先选择非最平街道（如25th Ave+Geary而非23rd Ave）
- 界面交互存在困惑：连续滑块对离散选项的处理、不可理解的颜色编码、海拔标签位置混乱
- 未考虑自行车道连通性与路面质量，缺乏对‘不连续段’和区域‘混乱度’的处理
- 无法自定义‘最平’与‘距离/海拔增益’的权衡，用户需自行在坡度与路程间权衡
待验证问题
- 您是否希望在‘最平路线’与‘最短距离/最小海拔增益’之间通过自定义权重进行权衡？
- 您最在意自行车路径的哪些非坡度因素（如路面质量、连通性、区域舒适度）？
- 您是否曾因工具路径建议错误而绕行或调整路线？请描述具体情况。
证据
原话 · @Anonymous
It would be neat if it there were an option which added distance and elevation gain, but minimized the grade.
原话 · @Anonymous
It's not accurate. I mapped it from my house on Cabrillo St in the outer Richmond to 4th avenue and it says I need to climb 25th avenue then walk Geary instead of correctly telling me to use 23rd avenue that is completely flat.
原话 · @Anonymous
There's a weird thing going on at 22nd and San Jose in the Mission, where it doesn't seem to understand that you can simply continue down 22nd, but instead takes a hook down San Jose before backtracking.
原话 · @Anonymous
As a life-long city cyclist, with a fable for going fast while staying pedantically lawful, I found that my prefered routes are not about avoiding hills, but about: 1. The length of uninterrupted high quality bicycle ways (e.g. no traffic lights crossings etc.), a 2 km uninterrupted path beats a 1 km route with a ton of crossings and traffic lights 2. The quality of the bicycle path surface. I accept a slightly longer path if the road surface doesn't resemble a moon landscape
免责声明：本卡片由 AI 从社区讨论中提炼，属于「痛点证据」，是需求分析与验证的起点，不等同于「已验证的市场需求」。AI 存在分析局限，关键决策前请打开上方原始讨论人工复核。